The Scientist spoke with University of Liverpool aging and longevity researcher João Pedro de Magalhães about how human biases can influence scientific priorities and outcomes in genetics.
Preprints can be valuable additions to the scientific literature. But we must start seeing them as perishable commodities rather than akin to peer-reviewed, published studies.
In this webinar brought to you by Bio-Rad, Jörg Bantin and Eddy van Collenburg will discuss when ddPCR should be used instead of qPCR and how to ease the transition.
Can you think of a 5-letter word for “worry of stratospheric proportions”?
Thanks for reading! I’m Christie, and I curate and edit this newsletter. My inbox is always open, so if you have thoughts or ideas about this newsletter or tips for our news team, I’d love to hear from you.
Never miss an email from The Scientist. Click hereto add The Scientist to your safe-sender list.
The Scientist,1000 N West Street, Suite 1200, Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19801 Toll-Free: (888) 781-0328 | Phone: (705) 528-6888 Email: privacy@the-scientist.com
.png?upscale=true&width=600&upscale=true&name=MSIG-Cast%20Fast-%20Turbomix%20Bis-Tris%20Gel%20Casting%20Kits-%20Learn%20How%20(Banner).png)
Genome Spotlight: %20nov%204.jpg?upscale=true&width=320&height=320&upscale=true&name=800x800%20(1)%20nov%204.jpg "Thinking Digital: When qPCR Doesn’t Make the Cut")
